The competitive scene in ARC Raiders is facing growing frustration from players, particularly solo participants, who feel the current ranking system is unfair. At present, solo players share the same leaderboard as trio teams, creating a significant gap in performance potential. While teams of three can combine their efforts to complete objectives faster, solo players are left to tackle challenges alone, often falling behind despite their strong individual skills buy ARC Raiders items cheap.
The Problem With Shared Leaderboards
One of the main criticisms from the community is that the shared leaderboard structure penalizes solo players. Trio teams naturally accumulate more points and finish missions more quickly, giving them a clear advantage over individuals. This imbalance makes it nearly impossible for solo players to compete on equal footing, leading to frustration and a drop in motivation. The current system discourages solo gameplay and pressures players to form teams just to remain competitive.
Proposed Solutions From the Community
In response to the ongoing concerns, the ARC Raiders community has proposed several potential solutions. One of the most discussed ideas is to create separate leaderboards for solo, duo, and trio modes, allowing each playstyle to be recognized on its own terms. This would ensure that solo players are not unfairly compared to teams of three, creating a more balanced and equitable competitive environment.
Another suggestion is to introduce score multipliers, which could boost solo or duo scores based on the difficulty level of the challenges completed. This approach would help to level the playing field by compensating for the advantage that trio teams currently hold.
A Path Toward Competitive Integrity
Many fans of ARC Raiders believe that implementing these changes would greatly improve the competitive experience for all players. By creating separate leaderboards or matchmaking queues, the game could promote a greater diversity of playstyles, allowing individual skill to be properly recognized while maintaining the fun and challenge of the competitive mode. These adjustments would also help to ensure that the mode remains enjoyable for everyone, regardless of whether they prefer solo or team-based play.
Conclusion
Until official changes are made, the discussion around ranking fairness will likely remain a top topic within the ARC Raiders community. The current system creates an uneven playing field, particularly for solo players, and many are hoping that developers will take these concerns into account when considering future updates. With the right adjustments, ARC Raiders can offer a more balanced and inclusive competitive scene, encouraging a wider range of playstyles and ensuring that all players can compete on fair terms.
